On the Consequences of the Violation of Critical Pedagogy Principles from Iranian EFL Teacher Trainers’ Perspectives

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Allameh Tabataba’i University

Abstract

The application of critical pedagogy in educational contexts has received adequate research attention over the last decades. The main focus of this strand of research has, however, been on raising awareness of the educators. Nevertheless, little is known about the consequences of the violation of critical pedagogy principles from EFL teacher trainers’ perspectives. To begin to address this gap in research, a qualitative (phenomenological) study was carried out to explore the main consequences of violating critical pedagogy in the higher education system of Iran. The participants were 15 faculty members of TEFL and English Literature at 10 Iranian state universities. The data were collected through in-depth semi-structured face-to-face interviews and analyzed according to Radnor’s (2001) model. The results indicated that the main consequences of the violation of critical pedagogy were educational (related to teaching, learning, and testing), psychological, social, and ideological. Therefore, it was concluded that educators must follow the principles of CP in order to avoid the negative consequences and foster the learning and teaching processes more effectively. 

Keywords


Abdelrahim, A. T. (2007). The relationship between gender and experience in teachers’ awareness of critical pedagogy. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran, Iran.

Aliakbari, M., Azimi Amoli, F. (2014). Teachers’ awareness of critical pedagogy: A case study of Iranian EFL teachers. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 3 (1),128-134..  Natural and Social Sciences, 3(1), 128-134.

Aliakbari, M., & Faraji, E. (2011). Basic principles of critical pedagogy. Second International Conference on Humanities, Historical And Social Sciences IPEDR, 17. 78-85. Available Online at http://www.ipedr.com/vol17/14-CHHSS%202011-H00057.pdf.

Alibakhshi, G. (2011).Onthe impacts of gender and personality types on Iranian EFL teachers teaching efficacy and teaching activities preferences. IJAL, 14(1),1-23.

Alibakhshi, G., & Macky, A. (2012). Critical pedagogy in Iranian universities. Where are we? . Paper Presented in Ninth International Conference of Iranian English Teaching and Literature Conference, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.

Alibakhshi, G., Kiani, G. R., Akbari, R. (2009).On the consequential validity of ESP tests.  Applied linguistics journal of Tabriz Azad University, 1(2), 103-126.

Azimi, H. (2007). On the attitude of English teachers and university students in the Implementation of critical pedagogy. (Unpublished master’s thesis).Tarbiat Modares University. Tehran, Iran.

Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods. (2nd edition). Belmont, CA:  Wadsworth.

Bartolome, L. I. (2004). Critical pedagogy and teacher education: Radicalizing prospective teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(2), 97-122.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Edmondson, J., & D’Urso, A. (2007). The importance of being critical: Opening possibilities and hope in education policy study. Journal of Critical Education Policy Study, 5(1), 23-35.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum Books.

Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of   education. New York, NY: Routledge.

Giroux, H. A. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. A critical reader. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Hollstein, M. S. (2006). Critical pedagogy: Pre-service teachers’ perspectives. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Ohio.

Horan, N. L. (2004). Finding oneself in the classroom: A critical auto ethnographic narrative chronicling the risks and rewards of a teacher and her students as they engage in the practice of a critical pedagogy. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University ofSt. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Hovey, R. (2004). Critical pedagogy and international studies: Reconstructing knowledge through dialogue with the subaltern. International Relations, 18(2), 241-254.

James, K. (2008). A critical theory and postmodernist approach to the teaching of accounting theory. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(2), 643-676.

Keesing-Styles, L. (2003). The relationship between critical pedagogy and assessment in teacher education. Radical Pedagogy, 5(1). Retrieved from http://radicalpedagogy. icaap.org/content/issue5_1/03_keesing-styles.htm

Kanpol, B. (1998). Critical pedagogy for beginning teachers: The movement from despair to hope. Online Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 2(1). Retrieved from http://users.  monash.edu.au

Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). Critical constructivism. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy and the knowledge wars of the twenty-first century. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 1(1), 30-46.

Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. L. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Luke, A. (1988). Literacy, textbooks, and ideology. London, England: Falmer.

McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. White Plains, NY: Longman.

McLaren, P. (2003). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In A. Darder, M., Baltodano & D. R. Torres (Eds.), The Critical pedagogy reader (pp. 69- 103) New York: Routledge Falmer.

Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard  Educational Review, 62, 279-300.

Momenian, M., & Shirazizadeh, M. (2009). Putting things right: State-of-the-art on critical pedagogy and writing. MJAL 1(4), 223-243.

Monchinski, T. (2008). Critical pedagogy and the everyday classroom. Berlin, Springer.

Ohara, Y., Saft, S., & Crookes, G. (2000). Teacher exploration of feminist critical pedagogy in beginning Japanese as a foreign language class. Paper presented at the Universityof Hawaii at Manoa.

Padget, D. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and  rewards. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (2nd edition).  Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Pinar, W. F., & Bowers, C. A. (1992). Politics of curriculum: Origins, controversies, and significance of critical perspectives. Review of Research in Education, 18 (1), 163- 190.

Radnor, H. (2001). Researching your professional practice. Doing interpretive  research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.

Peterson, R.E. (2003). Teaching how to read the world and change it: Critical pedagogy in the intermediate grades. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres, (Eds.). The critical pedagogy reader. Great Britain: Routledge Falmer.

Shor, I. (1980). Critical teaching and everyday life. Boston, MA: South End.

Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

Shannon, P. (Ed.). (1992). Becoming political: Readings and writings in the politics of literacy education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.

Simon, R. (1992). Teaching against the grain. New York, NY: Bergin and Garvey.

Yilmaz, K. (2009). Elementary school teachers’ views about the critical pedagogy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 139-149.