The Role of Visualization in EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Recall of Short Stories

Document Type: Research Paper

Author

Sabzevar University of Teacher Education

Abstract

Generally speaking, lexical items that enter our minds through reading a text commonly leave us with pictures, sounds, echoes, and feelings in the mind. While the ability to produce images in the mind in the process of reading appears to be vital for greater comprehension and recall of texts, research has indicated that many poor readers seemingly do not visualize as they read. On the contrary, those readers who do typically visualize achieve greater comprehension and recall (see Tomlinson, 1997). In this study, in line with Wittrock’s ‘generative learning theory’ (e.g., 1992), two fairly homogeneous groups of EFL undergraduates (N=50), after taking a reading comprehension test to ensure that their reading comprehension differences are not significant, were randomly assigned to attend a short-story course in two different sections—one serving as the experimental and the other as the control group, both studying the same short stories, and both being taught by the researcher as their instructor of the course. The experimental group was instructed how to form pictures in the mind—i.e., how to visualize—before reading, while reading, and after reading a short story, for example, by being requested to draw pictures of the characters, scenes, or settings in the story as they perceived them. The control group, however, did not receive any training with respect to imagery production and was not told to practice visualization before, while, or after reading the same texts as the experimental group did. The results of a reading comprehension test on the short stories that had been discussed in both classes, and also a recall test, administered two weeks later, indicated that the “visualizers” significantly outperformed the “non-visualizers”, i.e., the control group, on both tests.

Keywords


Anderson, R. C., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1972). “Imagery and prose learning”, in Journal of Educational Psychology 63, pp. 242-243.

Anderson, R. C., and Pearson, P. D. (1984). “A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension”, in P. D. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of reading research,New York: Longman, pp. 255-291.

Block, E. (1986). “The comprehension strategies of second language readers”, in TESOL Quarterly 20, pp. 463-494.

Bonn, K. L., and Grabowski, B. L. (2001). Generative learning theory: A practical cousin to constructivism (Paper presented at the Joint Mathematics Meetings, New Orleans). Retrieved December 10, 2007, available at: http://www.math.mtu.edu/~klbonn/GLT_in_New_Orleans.html

Brewer, W. F. (1988). “Postscript: Imagery and text genre”,Text 8, pp. 431-8.

Bull, B. L., and Wittrock, M. C. (1973). “Imagery in the learning of verbal definitions”, in British Journal of Educational Psychology­ 43(3), pp. 289-293.

Eskey, D. E. (1973). “A model program for teaching advanced reading to students of English as a foreign language”, in Language Learning 23, pp. 169-184.

Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English,London andNew York: Longman.

Hobbs, R. (2001). “Improving reading comprehension by using media literacy activities”, in Voices from the Middle 8(4), pp. 44-50.

Jimenez, R. P., Garcia, G. E., and Pearson, P. D. (1996). “The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles”, in Reading Research Quarterly 31(1), pp. 90-112.

Knight, S. L., Padron, Y. N. and Waxman, H. C. (1985). “The cognitive reading strategies of ESL students”, in TESOL Quarterly 19, pp. 789-792.

Kourilsky, M., and Wittrock, M. C. (1987). “Verbal and graphical strategies in teaching economics”, in Teaching and Teacher Education 3(1), pp. 1-12.‎‎

Kulhavy, R.­ W., and Swenson, I.(1975). “Imagery instructions and the comprehension of text”, in British Journal of Educational Psychology 45, pp. 47-51.

       NationalReadingPanel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based      assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction.

NIH Publication No.­00-4754.­Washington­ DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Retrieved September 21, 2008,         available at: http://www.fcrr.org

Padron, Y. N., and Waxman, H. C. (1988). “The effect of ESL students’ perceptions of their cognitive strategies on reading achievement”, in TESOL Quarterly 22, pp. 146-150.

Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes,Hillsdale,New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach,New York: Oxford University Press.

Pearson, P. D. (1985). “Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction”, in The Reading Teacher 38, pp. 724-738.

Sadoski, M., and Willson, V. L. (2006). “Effects of a theoretically based large-scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district”, in American Educational Research Journal 43, pp. 135-152.

Sheehan, R. (2003). The reader as a productive consumer of text; activating schemata and exploiting lexical networks to assist text processing. Retrieved April  19,  2007,  available  at:

Shepard, R. N. (1967). “Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures”, in  Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior 6, pp. 156-163.        

Stevick, E. (1986). Images and options in the language classroom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (1997). The role of visualization in the reading of literature by learners of a foreign language (Unpublished PhD thesis,University ofNottingham). Microfilmed version: The British Library, British Thesis Service.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). “Seeing what they mean: helping L2 readers to visualize”, in B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials development in language teaching,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265-78.

Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics,Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wittrock, M. C. (1974). “Learning as a generative process”, in Educational Psychologist 11(2), pp. 87-95.

Wittrock, M. C. (1983). “Writing and the teaching of reading”, ­ in Language Arts 60(5), pp. 600-606.

Wittrock, M. C. (1985). “Teaching learners generative strategies for enhancing reading comprehension”, in Theory into practice 24(5), pp. 123-26.

Wittrock, M. C. (1990). “Generative processes­ of comprehension”, in Educational Psychologist 24(4), pp. 345-376.

Wittrock,­­ M. C. (1991). “Generative teaching of comprehension”, in Elementary School Journal 92, pp. 167-82.

Wittrock, M. C. (1992). “Generative learning processes of the brain”, in Educational Psychologist 27(4), pp. 531-41.

Wittrock, M. C., and Alesandrini, K. (1990). “Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities”, in American Educational Research Journal 27(3), pp. 489-502.