On the Relationship Between Iranian EFL Teachers' Quality of Work Life and Their Teaching Efficacy

Document Type: Research Paper


1 Allameh Tabataba’i university

2 Imam Khomeini International University

3 Payame-noor University


The review of the literature indicates EFL teachers’ sense of efficacy has been influenced by cognitive and affective factors. Socio-economic factors may also influence EFL teachers’ sense of efficacy directly and their teaching effectiveness indirectly. One of the socioeconomic variables is the quality of work life (QWL). This study was an attempt to investigate the relationship between EFL teachers’ quality of work life and their teaching efficacy.  Ninety High school English teachers from Sistan and Baluchestan were selected. The data of the study were collected through two adapted instruments and analyzed through Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis. The results of the study showed that Iranian EFL teachers perceived themselves as having a good level of teaching efficacy. The results also showed that there was a significant correlation between all dimensions of QWL and teachers’ teaching efficacy except for “adequate and fair compensation” is significant at a P value of 0.05, but only one dimension of QWL could predict teachers’ teaching efficacy. Therefore, it could be strongly argued that teachers’ QWL is not the only influential factor in teaching efficacy.


Adams, C., & Pierce, R.) 1999(. Characteristics of effective teaching. Language Teaching, 102-107. Retrieved July 5, 2012 from the ERIC database.

Akdere, M.  (2006). Improving quality of work life: Implications for human resources. Business Review, 6 (1), 173-177.

Anbugeetha, D. (2013). A study on quality of work life at a garment manufacturing unit in Perndurai – A case study. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 3(6), 76-87.

Asgari, H., & Dadashi, M. (2011). Determining the relationship between quality of work life and organizational commitment of Melli Bank staff in west domain of Mazandaran. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(8), 682-687.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Gordian, Y. (2012). Motivation and quality of work life among secondary school EFL teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 30-42.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

Coladric, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 16(3), 323-337.

Crookes, G. (1997a). What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach?. Modern Language Journal, 81, 67-79.

Crookes, G. (1997b). SLA and language pedagogy: A socioeducational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 93–116.

Day, C. Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 563-577.

Dolan, S. L, García, S., Cabezas, C., Tzafrir, S. S. (2008). Predictors of quality of work and “poor health” among primary health-care personnel in Catalonia:  Evidence based on cross-sectional, retrospective and longitudinal design”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 21 (2), 203–218

Dolan, S.L., Saba, T., Jackson, S.E., & Schuler, R.S. (2007). Gestion des resources humaines: Tendacies, enjeux et pratiques actualles (4th ed.), ERPI (Canada) and Pearson Education, Paris.

Donald, C., et al. (2005). Quality of working life indicators in Canadian health care organizations: A tool for healthy healthcare work places. Occupational Medicine, 5(1), 54-59

Emadzadeh, M. k., Khorasani, M. & Nematizadeh, F. (2012). Assessing the quality of work life of primary school teachers in Isfahan. Interdisciplinary Journal of contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 438-448.

Emmer, E., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management.    Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(4), 755–765.

Flippo, E. B. (1980). Personnel Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Bo Company.

Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582.

Goodard, R. D., & Goodard, Y. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 807-818.

Guskey, T. R. (1981). Measurement of responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 44-56.

Havlovic, S. J., (1991). Quality of work life and human resource outcomes. Industrial Relations, 30(3), 469-479.

Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. H. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 279–300.

Hua, J. (2006). A study of the relationship on the Bureau of Investigation officials, quality of work life, work pressure, and Job satisfaction (Masters’ thesis). Public Affairs management, etd- 0725106-162508.

Kheirandish, S. M. (2009). Relation between working life quality and performance of employees in Irankhodro Dizeli Company (Masters’ thesis). Alameh Tabatabaii University, Tehran, Iran.

Jofreh, M., Yasini, A., Faraji Dehsorkhi, H., & Hayat, A. (2013). The Relationship between EFL teachers’ quality of work life and job motivation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13 (3), 338-346.

Johnstone, R. (2004). Language teacher education. In A. Davies & C. Elder, (Ed), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp.649-671). Oxford: Blackwell.

Kline, P. (1999). Handbook of psychological testing. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Lau, R. S. M. (2000). Quality of work life and Performance. International Journal of service industry, 3(1), 155-162.

London, M. (1983). Toward a theory of career motivation. Academy of Management Review, 8, 620-630.

Luthans, F. (1998). Organizational behavior. (8th edition). Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Monfaredniya, N. (2008). Examination of relation between working life quality and vocational weariness of Tehran Azad Universities employees. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tehran IT University.

Nadler, D. A. & Lawler, E.E. (1983). Quality of Work Life: Perspective and Direction. Organizational Dynamics, 11(3), 20-30.

Pinder, C. C. (1998). Work motivation in organisational behaviour. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Rethinam, G., & Ismail, M. (2008). Constructs of quality of work life: A perspective of information and technology professionals. European Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 226233.

Riggs, I., & Enchos, L. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(4), 625–663.

Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51-65.

Rose, C.R., Beh, L.S., Uli, J, & Idris, K. (2006). An analysis of quality of work life and career- related variables. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 3 (12), 2151-2159.

Shahrashoob, T. (2006). Examination of relation between working life quality and organizational commitment in Gonbadkavoos Schools. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Allame Tabatabaii University, Tehran, Iran.

Singh, J. (2000). Performance productivity and quality of frontline employees in service organizations. Journal of Marketing, 64, 15-35.

Soodak, L. C., & Podell, P. M. (1996). Teacher efficacy: Toward understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 401–411.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self efficacybeliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944-956.

Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of work life: what is it? Sloan Management Review Journal, 15, 11-21.

Wheatley, K. F. (2001). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5-22.