Globalization, Standardization, and Dialect Leveling in Iran

Document Type: Research Paper


1 Tarbiat Modares University, Iran

2 Neyshaboor Higher Education Complex, Iran


This paper is an attempt to shed light on the effects of modernization, urbanization, monolingual educational system, and mass media as well as the process of globalization on dialect leveling among Persian dialects. In so doing, the first part of the paper elaborates on the relationship between globalization and sociolinguistics, and on the concept of standardization.
Also, it discusses some factors accelerating dialect leveling among Persian dialects. The second part of the paper presents some empirical evidence for the change, based on the data collected from 3 Persian dialects, namely: Birjandi, Neyshaboori, and Yazdi. Three spoken language sample corpora from two age cohort groups in each speech community were collected.
Having transcribed the data, the researchers juxtaposed the phonological, morphological, and syntactic conventions of the two groups of each speech community for further in-depth analysis. Comparing the speech samples of the two age cohorts in each corpus revealed significant movements towards standard dialect. However, the quality and quantity of the observed movements did not appear to be the same across the dialects in question. 


Blommaert, J. (2003). “Commentary: a sociolinguistics of globalization”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, pp. 607-623.

Coulmas, F. (2005). Sociolinguistics the Study of Speaker’s Choices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coupland, N. (2003). “Introduction: Sociolinguistics and globalization”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, pp. 465-472.

Eckert, P. and Wanger, E. (2005). “What is the role of power in sociolinguistic variation?”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, pp. 582-589.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power, New York: Longman.

Heffernan, K. (2006). “Prosodic leveling during language shift; Okinawan approximations of Japanese path-accent”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10, pp. 641-666.

Heller, M. (2003). “Globalization, the new economy, and the communication of language and identity”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, pp.  473- 492.

Labov, W. (1981). What can be inferred about change in progress from synchronic description? Variation Omnibus (NWAVE VIII), pp. 177-200.

Meyerhoff, M. and Niedzielski, N. (2003). “The globalization of vernacular variation”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, pp. 534-555.

Milory, J. (2001). “Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, pp. 530-555.

Torgersen, E. and Kerswill, P. (2004). “Internal and external motivation in phonetic change: dialect leveling outcomes for an English vowel shift”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, pp. 23-53.

Wardhaugh, R. (1989). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, Oxford and Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

Watt, D. (2000). “Phonetic parallels between the close-mid vowels of Tyneside English”, Language Variation and Change, 12, pp. 69-100.