Social and Religious Functions Performed by the Ritual Speech Act of “ya Allah” in Iranian Interactions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

The current study was carried out to investigate the functions of the ritual speech act of ‘ya Allah’ (literally meaning ‘O God’) employed by Iranians in social interactions. To this end, sixty-two Persian native speakers of different age groups, ranging from 35 to 85, of both genders were observed in 250 natural situations such as daily interactions, gatherings, public or private places and local TV programs until the saturation point. Their verbal interactions were recorded, transcribed and later analyzed. Moreover, in order to corroborate the representativeness of samples, ten people were interviewed and were asked directly when they utter ‘ya Allah’. It was concluded that the speech act may be employed in either religious or non-religious contexts to serve two major functions: to ask for permission (to enter a place) or call for an action. Moreover, the two major functions of the speech act in question may be broken down into nine minor functions: (1) Declaring one’s entering a house/apartment/orchard, tent or the like to be allowed or welcomed by the owner/insiders; (2) Warning intimate women to observe their hijab, when a strange man is to enter; (3) Entering a place in general, especially employed by men; (4) Being late to join community prayers; (5) Greeting someone who has just joined a group; (7) Commencing an action; (8) Asking someone to hurry up and (9) Doing something difficult with the help of others unanimously.

Keywords

References

Al-khatani, W. (2005). Refusal realizations in three different cultures: A speech act theoretically-based cross-cultural study. Journal of King Saud University, 18, 35-57.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ballmer, T., & Brennenstuhl, W. (1981). Speech act classification: A study in the lexical analysis of English speech activity verbs. Berlin: Spriger-Verlag.
Cohen, A. D. (1996). Speech acts. In S. L. McKay & H. N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 383-420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, A. D., & Ishihara, N. (2005). A web-based approach to strategic learning of speech acts: Research report. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved November 15, 2011, from http://carla.acad.umn.edu/ speechacts/Japanese%20Speech%20Act%20Report%20Rev.%20June05.pdf
Croft, W. (1994). Speech act classification, language typology and cognition. In S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech act theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives (pp. 460-477). London: Routledge.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition (3rd ed.). New York and London: Routledge.
Gisladottir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., Schriefers, H., & Levinson, S. C. (2012). Speech act recognition in conversation: Experimental evidence. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp.­ 1596-1601). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Morady Moghaddam, M. (2012). Discourse structures of condolence speech act. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10, 105-125.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 257-288). New York: Academic Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stapleton, L. E. (2004). Variation in the performance of speech acts in Peninsular Spanish: Apologies and requests (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisiana, Mississippi.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Yule, G. (1996). The study of language (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies
Volume 5, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
September 2013
Pages 31-46

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics