Self-monitoring in Non-academic EFL Learners’ Composition Writing

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of using the technique of self-monitoring on non-academic EFL learners’ composition writing. Fifty female students studying English at Navid English Institute in Shiraz, Iran were chosen based on the results of a proficiency test. They were all 16-20 years old and were intermediate learners of English who were divided into two control and experimental groups and took a writing pre-test. The experimental group (EG) received a training program on the effective use of the technique of self-monitoring proposed by Charles (1990). That is, they learned to add annotations expressing doubts and queries on various parts of their five composition drafts. The students in CG wrote their drafts without annotations. At the end of the twenty-second session course, both groups took a writing posttest. The results indicated that the learners in EG performed significantly better and the global features of organization and content in their writing were enhanced. Surveying the students’ views on self-monitoring, through a questionnaire, revealed their interest in taking charge of their writing task. Findings point to the efficacy of the self-monitoring technique in promoting learners’ writing proficiency and autonomy in handling writing tasks.

Keywords

References

Allan, D. (1982). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Binglan, Z., & Jia, C. (2010). The impact of teacher feedback on the long-term improvement in the accuracy of EFL student writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly), 33, 18-34.
Bitchener, J., Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
Charles, M. (1990). Responding to problems in written English using a student self-monitoring technique. ELT Journal, 44, 286-293.
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills theory and practice. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., Orlando: Florida.
Chaudron, C. (1984). The Effects of feedback on students’ composition revisions. RELC Journal, 15, 1-14.
Chen, C. W. Y. (2010). Graduate students’ self-reported perspectives regarding peer feedback and feedback from writing consultants. Springer, 11, 151-158.
Cho, K., & Cho, M. H. (2007). Using self-monitoring in learning to write. Workshop on Metacognition and SRL, 18, 13-22.
Cresswell, A. (2000). Self-monitoring in student writing: Developing learner responsibility. ELT Journal, 54, 244-253.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 33-54.
Johnston, H. (1996). Survey review: Process writing in course books. ELT Journal, 50, 347-355.
Kim, Y., & Kim. J. (2005). Teaching Korean university writing class: Balancing the process and the genre approach. The EFL Professional’s Written Forum, 7, 1-15.
Liu, K. (2006). Annotation as an index to critical writing. Urban Education, 41, 192-207.
Mei-yi, L. (n.d.). Students’ self-monitoring technique on writing and composition revisions. Retrieved October 10, 2009 from http://www.ccss.edu.hk.
Mi-mi, L. (2009). Adopting varied feedback modes in the EFL writing class.US-China Foreign Language, 7, 60-63.
Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141.
Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33, 293-308.
Muncie, J. (2000). Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal, 54, 47-53.
Rahimi, M. (2009). The role of teacher’s corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy over time: Is learner’s mother tongue relevant? Springer, 22, 219-243.
Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2006). Top Notch 3A. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Sengupta, S. (2000). An investigation into the effects of revision strategy instruction on L2 secondary school learners. System, 28, 97-113.
Sun, C. & Feng, G. (2009). Process approach to teaching writing applied in different teaching models. English Language Teaching, 2, 150-155.
Talebinezhad, M. R., & Sadeghi Beniss, A. R. (2005). Non-academic L2 users: A neglected research pool in ELT in Iran. Linguistic Online, 25, 85-96.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
Vanderveen, T. (2006). The effect of EFL students’ self-monitoring on class achievement test scores. JALT Journal, 28, 197-206.
Wolfe, L. H., Herron, & Goddard, Y. L. (2000). Effects of self-monitoring on the on-task behavior and written language performance of elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 49-73.
Xiang, W. (2004). Encouraging self-monitoring in writing by Chinese students. ELT Journal, 58, 238-246.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-102.
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies
Volume 5, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
September 2013
Pages 47-76

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics