An Introspective Analysis of EAP Researchers’ Perceived Academic Writing Competence: The Case of Research Articles

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Ilam University

2 Ilam University,


Over the last decades, there has been a plethora of interest in possible challenges encountered by researchers while publishing research articles (RAs) in various disciplines for English for academic purposes (EAP).Given this, this study aimed to examine how a sampled number of EAPIranian researchers perceive the competence of academic RA writing, the major reasons for RA rejection, and difficulties the authors face in writing up publishable RAs. Data for this study came from an examination of rejection emails and follow-up interviews with a number of Iranian EAP researchers who have published in highly prestigious journals. Analysis of the data resulted in 545 codes, 40 subcategories, and six core categories. The main categories included the potential reasons of RA rejection; the authors’ challenges in RA writing; RA linguistic features; RA stylistic features; essential elements of writing RA sections; and the features of RA citation and referencing.Pedagogical implications are discussed.


Allison, D., Cooley, L., Lewkowicz, J., & Nunan, D. (1998). Dissertation writing in action: The development of a dissertation writing support program for ESL graduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 17(2), 199-217.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Bartol, K. M. (1983). Manuscript faults and review board recommendations: Lethal and nonlethal errors. In American Psychological Association, Committee on Women in Psychology and Women’s Programs Office, Understanding the manuscript review process: Increasing the participation of women (pp. 29–45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47-49.
Bruce, I. (2008). Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 38-54.
Buckingham, L. (2008). Academic writing competence by Turkish scholars. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 1-18.
Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. English for Academic Purposes, 4, 207-224.
Calfee, R. C., & Valencia, R. R. (2007). APA guide to preparing manuscripts for journal publication (Revised) [Technical guide]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A Move/Step model for Methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90-106.
Cotos, E., Link, S., & Huffman, S. (2016). Studying disciplinary corpora to teach the craft of Discussion. Writing and Pedagogy, 8(1), 33-64.
Crosthwaite, P., Cheun, L., & Jiang, F. (2017). Writing with attitude: stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for specific purposes, 46, 107-123. 
Derntl, M. (2014). Basics of research paper writing and publishing. International journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6 (2), 105–123.
Davis, M. (1997). Scientific Papers and Presentations. Academic Press, San Diego, (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Hinkel, E. (CA.
Eyles, J., & Smith, D. M. (1988). Interpreting the geographical world : qualitative approaches in geographical research. Cambridge, Polity.
Flowerdew, L. (1998). Corpus linguistic techniques applied to text linguistics. System, 26, 541‐552.
Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (1), 17-150.
Hartley, J. 2003). Adverbial markers and tone in L1 and L2 student’s writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1049-1068.
Hood, S. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 37‐49.
Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters, and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9 (4), 179-197.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London Continuum.
Jalongo, M. R. (2013). Professional wisdom and writing for publication: Qualitative interviews with editors and authors in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(1), 65-79. doi: 10.1007/s10643-012-0569-y .
Jalongo, M. R., & Saracho, O. N. (2016). Writing for publication: Transitions and tools that support scholars’ success. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland.
Kitchin, R., & Tate, N. J. (2000). Conducting research into Human Geography: Theory, methodology and practice. Harlow, Prentice Hall.
Li, L., & Ge, G. (2009). Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical RA (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28, 93-104.
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280‐302.
Morton, J., Storch, N., Thompson, C. (2015). What our students tell us: Perceptions of three multilingual students on their academic writing in first year. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 1-13.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
O’Connor, M. (1995). Writing Successfully in Science. London: Chapman & Hall.
Paltridge, B. (1995). Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 393-406.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479-497.
Samaraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Shuhui, X., &Weicheng, Z. (2011). Developing Chinese undergraduate English-Majors’ research article writing competence. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Quarterly), 3, 5-24.
Snow, C. E. &Uccelli, P. 2009. The challenge of academic writing. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy (pp. 112-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. (1998). A psychologist’s companion: A guide to scientific writing for students and researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, UK: Sage.
Sznajder, H. S. (2005). A corpus based description of metaphorical marking patterns in scientific and popular business discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 172-182.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills (2nd Ed.). Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Tan-De Ramos, J. (2010). A comparative study of the discourse marker types in the body Section of the research papers of DLSU students. TESOL Journal, 2, 62-73.
Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (2), 129-148.
Victora. C., & Moreira, C. (2006). North-South relations in scientific publications. Rev SaudePublica, 40, 36-42.
Vold, T. E. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A crosslinguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 61-87.
Wette, R. (2017). Using mind maps to reveal and develop genre knowledge in a graduate writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 58-71.