(Dis)agreements in Iranians’ Internet Relay Chats

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Abstract

The present study on politeness is an attempt to examine (dis)agreeing strategies utilized by EFL learners while chatting on the internet. Subjects of the study were forty male and thirty-three female Iranian natives whose internet relay chat (IRC) interactions, composed of 400 excerpts, were collected between December 2007 and September 2008. Data analysis was based on the general taxonomy of politeness strategies suggested by Brown and Levinson (1987) which is the baseline of many politeness studies today. The results indicate that IRC is a mode of communication whose characteristics are typically different from face-to-face and real-life conversational settings. Some common face threatening acts (FTAs) like ‘direct disagreements’ are performed widely in chat channels. Furthermore, gender-oriented differences were found not to be statistically significant on the internet.

Keywords

References

Agyekum, K. (2008). The pragmatics of Akan greetings. Discourse Studies, 10, 493-516.

Arredondo, L. (2007). Communicate effectively. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP.

Clemen, G. (2002). Hedging in English journalistic economics. In A. Nuoppen, T. Harakka, & R. Tatje (Eds.), Interculturelle wirtschaftkommunikation forschungsobjekte und methoden (pp. 41-47). Report 93. Vaasa: The University of Vaasa. Retrieved April, 15, 2012, from http://lipas.uwasa.fi/comm/publications/

Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edstorm, A. (2004). Expressions of disagreement by Venezuelans in conversation: Reconsidering the influence of culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1499-1518.

Erbert, L. A., & Floyd, K. (2004). Affectionate expressions as face-threatening acts: Receiver assessments. Communication Studies, 55, 254-270.              

Ferencik, M. (2007). Exercising politeness: Membership categorization in a radio phone-in programme. Pragmatics, 17, 351-370.

Fraser, B. (2005). Whither politeness. In R. T. Lakoff & S. Ide (Eds), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness (pp. 65-83). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Fukada, A., & Asato, N. (2004). Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1991-2002.

Garcia-Pastor, M. D. (2008). Political campaign debates as zero-sum games: Impoliteness and power in candidates’ exchanges. In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher (Eds), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 101-126). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Georgakopoulou, A. (2001). Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1881-1900.                 

Georgalidou, M. (2008). The contextual parameters of linguistic choice: Greek children’s preferences for the formation of directive speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 72-94. 

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. NY: Garden City.

Green, N., & Carberry, S. (1999). Interpreting and generating indirect answers. Computational Linguistics, 25, 389-435.

Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2006). ‘I totally agree with you’: Gender interactions in educational online discussion groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 368-381.

Hatipoglu, C. (2007). (Im)politeness, national and professional identities and context: Some evidence from e-mailed ‘call for papers’. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 760-773.

Haugh, M. (2003). Anticipated versus inferred politeness. Multilingua, 22, 397-413.

Herring, S. C., & Martinson, A. (2004). Assessing gender authenticity in computer-mediated language use: Evidence from an identity game. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 424-446.

Holmes, J. (1999). Women, men and politeness: Agreeable and disagreeable responses. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds), The discourse reader (pp. 336-345). NY: Routledge.               

Holtgraves, T. (1997). Yes, but … positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 222-239.      

Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9, 179-197.    

Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing, NY: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192.

Jalilifar, A. R. (2007). Hedging as a pragmatic strategy: Variations across disciplines and cultures. Teaching English Language and Literature (TELL), 1, 43-69.

Johnson, G. (2008). Colloquium: The relative learning benefits of synchronous and asynchronous text-based discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 166-169.

Koike, D. A., Vann, R. E., & Busquets, J. (2001). Spanish no, si: Reactive moves to perceived face-threatening acts, part II. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 879-899.

Koutlaki, S. A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: Tæ’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1733-1756.          

Ladegaard, H. J. (2004). Politeness in young children’s speech: Context, peer group influence and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 2003-2022.

Markman, K. M. (2009). ‘So what shall we talk about’: Openings and closings in chat-based virtual meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 150-170.

McLaren-Hankin, Y. (2008). ‘We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year’: Hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases. Discourse Studies, 10, 635-654.

Meyerhoff, M. (2006). Introducing sociolinguistics. NY: Routledge.

Morand, D. A. (2003). Politeness and the clash of interaction orders in cross cultural communication. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45, 521-540. 

Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society, 27, 85-111.

Oakman, J., Gifford, S., & Chlebowsky, N. (2003). A multilevel analysis of the interpersonal behavior of socially anxious people. Journal of Personality, 71, 397-434.

Precht, K. (2008). Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 89-111.

Ruhi, S. (2006). Politeness in complement responses: A perspective from naturally accruing exchanges in Turkish. Pragmatics, 16, 43-101.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 105-118). Washington: United States Information Agency.

Skelton, J. (1998). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal, 42, 37-43.             

Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.

Terkourafi, M. (2005). An argument for a frame-based approach to politeness: Evidence from the use of imperative in Cypriot Greek. In R. T. Lakoff & S. Ide (Eds), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness (pp.­­99-116). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Turnage, A. K. (2008). Email flaming behaviors and organizational conflict. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 43-59.

Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 83-102.                            

Vinagre, M. (2008). Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges. Computers & Education, 50, 1022-1036.    

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: CUP.

Yin, J. (2002). Telling the truth? A cultural comparison of ‘facilitating discussion’ in American talk. Discourse Processes, 33, 235-256. 

Yu, M. (2003). On the universality of face: Evidence from Chinese compliment response behavior. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1679-1710. 

Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies

Volume 3, Issue 2
Summer 2011
Pages 109-138

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics