The Effect of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on Iranian EFL Learners’ Idiom Learning and Perceptions of Classroom Activities

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, English Department, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran

2 English Department, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran,

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) on Iranian EFL learners' idiom learning and perceptions of classroom activities. To do so, this study was carried out in six classes at Imam Reza International University in Mashhad, Iran. The participants included 114 BA students of Teaching English field. The present study was quasi-experimental that utilized a mixed methods research design. It contained a control group with 45 participants and an experimental group with 69 participants. MALL for teaching idioms via Telegram was considered as a treatment in experimental group. In the present study, Telegram app was chosen because the researcher, the teachers, and the participants had similar experience of using this app. Pictures, texts, audio, and video files, were used as the materials in teaching idioms. Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Activities scale designed and validated by Gentry and Gable (2001) and translated into Persian and validated by Ghanizadeh and Jahedizadeh (2015) was used for assessing students’ perceptions of classroom activities (interest, choice, joy, and challenge). Twelve students in experimental group sat for an interview which was audio and video recorded. In the interview sessions, students were asked about the experience of informal learning in this research, the materials used, pros and cons toward the channel and MALL. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of mobile phone usage in enhancing EFL university students’ idiom learning as well as in students’ perceptions of classroom activities with the highest differences observed in challenge and joy perceptions. The results of the qualitative phase were also in line with those of the quantitate phase.

Keywords


Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL21(1), 76-95.
Abugohar, M. A., Yunus, K., & Rashid, R. A. (2019). Smartphone applications as a teaching technique for enhancing tertiary learners’ speaking skills: Perceptions and Practices. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(9), 74-92.
Akkara, S., Anumula, V., & Mallampalli, M. (2020). Impact of WhatsApp interaction on improving L2 speaking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(3), 250-259.
Al-Bogami, B., & Elyas, T. (2020). Promoting middle school students’ engagement through incorporating iPad apps in EFL/ESL classes. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1-18.
Alemi, M., Sarab, M. R. A., & Lari, Z. (2012). Successful learning of academic word list via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies5(6), 99-109.
Ally, M., Schafer, S., Cheung, B., McGreal, R., & Tin, T. (2007, October). Use of mobile learning technology to train ESL adults. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on mobile learning (pp. 7-12).‏
Alzubi, A. A. F., Singh, M. K. A., Mehar, P., & Hazaea, A. N. (2019). Investigating reading learning strategies through smartphones on Saudi learners’ psychological autonomy in reading context. International Journal of Instruction12(2), 99-114.
Baleghizadeh, S., & Oladrostam, E. (2010). The effect of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) on grammatical accuracy of EFL students. Mextesol Journal34(2), 1-10.‏
Che Mustaffa, N. U., & Sailin, S. N. (2022). A systematic review of mobile-assisted language learning research trends and practices in Malaysia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies16(5), 169-198.
Gentry, M., & Gable, R. K. (2001). My class activities: A survey instrument to assess students’ perceptions of interest, challenge, choice, and enjoyment in their classrooms. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). An exploration of EFL learners’ perceptions of classroom activities and their achievement goal orientations. International Journal of Research Studies in Education4(3), 33-45.
Ghorbandordinejad, F., Aghasafi, A., Farjadnasab, A., & Hardani, A. (2010). Mobile handheld recording devices in the general English classroom. In the First Symposium of Educational Technology, Oman.‏
Ghorbani, N., & Ebadi, S. (2020). Exploring learners’ grammatical development in mobile assisted language learning. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1704599.
Gibbs, R. W. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition8(2), 149-156.
Iravi, Y., & Malmir, A. (2022) The effect of lexical tools and applications on L2 vocabulary learning: A case of English academic core words. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2102638
Jahedizadeh, S., Ghanizadeh, A., & Ghonsooly, B. (2016). The role of EFL learners’ demotivation, perceptions of classroom activities, and mastery goal in predicting their language achievement and burnout. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education1(1), 1-17.
Jahedizadeh, S., Ghonsooly, B., Ghanizadeh, A., & Akbari, O. (2015). A cross-contextual analysis of EFL learners’ perceptions of classroom activities. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research2(4), 322-336.
Jannati, M., & Marzban, A. (2015). Iranian EFL learners’ perception of learning environment in English language institutes and its relationship with learners' English proficiency. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research2(3), 23-38.‏
Jia, C., & Hew, K. F. T. (2019). Supporting lower-level processes in EFL listening: The effect on learners’ listening proficiency of a dictation program supported by a mobile instant messaging app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-28.
John, D. S., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Students’ perceptions on the use of mobile learning to improve writing proficiency in the MUET. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 27(2), 1481-1492.
Khabiri, M., & Bagher Khatibi, M. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning: Practices among Iranian EFL learners. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences2(2s), pp-176.‏
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Jones, C. (2012). The next generation: Design and the infrastructure for learning in a mobile and networked world. In Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 57-78). IGI Global.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL20(3), 271-289.
Metruk, R. (2020). EFL learners’ perspectives on the use of smartphones in Higher Education settings in Slovakia. Electronic Journal of e-Learning18(6), 537-549.
Nariyati, N. P. L., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2020). EFL pre-service teachers’ perception toward the use of mobile assisted language learning in teaching English. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 38-47.
Okumuş D. K., Konca, M. Y., & Demiröz, H. (2020). The effect of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL learners’ collocation learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 489-509.
Pettit, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Going with the grain: Mobile devices in practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology23(1), 28-94.
Sharifi, A., Jahedizadeh, S., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The effect of simulation on middle school students’ perceptions of classroom activities and their foreign language achievement: A mixed-methods approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education9(3), 667-680.
Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning20(4), 365-383.‏