Self-Efficacy and Conceptions of Effective Online Teaching: Voices of Pre-Service EFL Teachers and Their Instructors

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Foreign Languages, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to explore pre-service EFL teachers’ conceptions and self-efficacy for effective online teaching and (b) to determine their instructors’ conceptions of online teaching effectiveness and their approaches to preparing them for effective online teaching. The participants were 100 MA students of TEFL and 6 teacher educators at Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST). The data collection instrument was a questionnaire with 40 principles of effective online teaching classified into 7 categories of facilitating learning, interaction, deep learning, relationship, resources, engagement, and organization followed by two open-ended questions. A semi-structured interview was also conducted to examine teacher educators’ conceptions of online teaching effectiveness. The results revealed that pre-service teachers considered themselves more self-efficacious in fostering relationship while less in maintaining organization in online English language classes. To be an effective online teacher, they also held the view that teachers need to establish a friendly atmosphere and relationship, provide useful materials, have adequate technological knowledge, give prompt feedback, and engage learners in their learning process. For teacher educators, effective online teaching was having adequate technological knowledge, providing appropriate content, establishing an online presence, successful classroom management, and having positive perceptions of online teaching.

Keywords

References

Abdelraheem, A. Y. (2003). Computerized learning environment: Problems, design challenges and future promises. Journal of interactive online learning, 2(2), 1-9.
Angiello, R. (2010). Study looks at online learning vs. traditional instruction. Education Digest, 76(2), 56-59.
Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2010). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1-19.
Bailey, J., & Card, A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 152-155.
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University.
Berge, Z. L. (1999). Active, interactive, and reflective e-learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 181–190.
Brinthaupt, T. M., Fisher, L. S., Gardner, J. G, Raffo, D. M., &Woodard, J. B. (2001). What the best online teachers should do. Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 515-524.
Caner, M., & Aydin, S. (2021). Self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers on technology integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 79-94.
Carr-Chellman, A., & Ducastel, P. (2001). The ideal online course. Library Trends, 50(1), 145-158.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Washington Center News.
Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective online instruction in higher education.                                                                                          The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11-14.
Compton, L. (2004). From chatting to oral fluency: Using chat to improve self-confidence and increase willingness to communicate. Teaching English with Technology, 4(1), 1-9.
             https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180814-5133.
Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314-324.
Davis, D., & Rose, R. (2007). Professional developments for virtual schooling and online learning.  North American Council of Online Learning.
Dawley, L. (2007). The tools for successful online teaching. Information Science Publishing.
Dolighan, T., & Owen, M. (2021). Teacher efficacy for online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brock Education Journal, 30(1), 95-116.
Easton, S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor’s role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52(2), 87-105.
Frazer, C., Sullivan, D. H., Weatherspoon, D. W., & Hussey, L. (2017). Faculty perception of online teaching effectiveness and indicators of quality. Nursing Research and Practice, 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9374189.
Gabriel, M. A., & Kaufield, K. J. (2008). Reciprocal mentorship: An effective support for online instructors. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(3), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260802233480.
Garbett, C. (2011). Activity-based costing models for alternative modes of delivering online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1, 1-14.
Hacker, D. J., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2000). Promoting deep and durable learning in the online classroom. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 84, 53-63.
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311–326.
Jones, C. M., & Youngs, B. L. (2006). Teacher preparation for online language instruction. In P. Hubbard and Levy, M. (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 267–280). John Benjamins.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533-541.
Knowlton, D. S. (2000). A theoretical framework for the online classroom: A defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 5−14.
Larson-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Lewis, C., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2006). Implementing effective online teaching practices: Voices of exemplary faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 83-98.
Ma, K., & Chutiyami, M., & Zhang, Y., & Nicoll, S. (2021). Online teaching self-efficacy during COVID-19: Changes, its associated factors and moderators. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6675–6697.
Malmir, A., & Mohammadi, P. (2018). Teachers’ reflective teaching and self-efficacy as predicators of their professional success: A case of Iranian EFL teachers. Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP), 6(1), 117–138.
Malmir A., & Vosooghi, N. (2023). Resilience and reflectivity as predictors of L2 reading comprehension: A case of Iranian EFL learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures (JJMLL), 15(2), 425–446.
McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (1999). Pedagogic roles and dynamics in telematics environments. In M. Selinger, and J. Pearson, Telematics in education: Trends and issues (pp. 32–50). Pergamon.  
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. Jossey-Bass.
Pelz, B. (2008). (My) Three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 103-16.
Schrum, L., Burbank, M. D., Engle, J., Chambers, J. A., & Glassett, K. F. (2005). Post-secondary educators’ professional development: Investigation of an online approach to enhancing teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 279-289.
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practices: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15, 157-190.
Tomlinson, B. (2009). Material development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Treacy, B. (2007). What’s different about teaching online? How are virtual schools changing teaching? Kentucky Virtual High School Newsletter, 1(2), 1-3.
Wood, C. (2005). Highschool.com. Edutopia, 1(4), 32–37.
Young, s. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(20), 65-77.
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2014). Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning communities in online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 220-232.
Zou, B., Huang, L., Ma, W., & Qiu, Y (2021). Evaluation of the effectiveness of EFL online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sage Open, 1-17.
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies
Volume 15, Issue 2
September 2023
Pages 113-132

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics