The Effect of Teaching Writing Skills on Ideology Transfer in Academic Writings of EFL Students: The Case of Iranian IELTS Candidates

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Languages, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Abstract

One strategy that eases the process of teaching argumentative writing might be teaching them how to express their thoughts, beliefs, and in general, ideologies in academic essays. This study aimed to investigate the effect of teaching writing skills on ideology transfer in the academic writings of EFL students. To this end, a sequential mixed-methods design was used. Participants were 80 male and female IELTS candidates who were selected based on some criteria such as proficiency level, age, and educational background. A sample Mock Writing Task 2 and a sample IELTS Writing Task 2 were used as instruments in the pre-test and post-test respectively. Learners’ essays produced during these stages were analyzed based on Fairclough’s (2001) three-dimensional model of critical discourse analysis: description, interpretation, and explanation. To analyze the data, content analysis methods were applied during which discursive strategies used by the candidates were identified and coded, and the frequency and percentage of them were calculated. After the analysis, the following themes were extracted in the participants’ writings, as representing ideology transfer: tendency towards representation of identity, use of active voices, use of first-person pronouns, social views, author visibility, ideology-laden concepts, and idea development. Moreover, there were significant changes in the post-test writings of the participants in terms of the number of discursive strategies used to express ideology. This shows that teaching writing skills can significantly affect EFL learners’ ability to transfer their ideology into academic writing. The findings can have some implications for EFL learners, teachers, and curriculum planners.

Keywords

References

Abudalbuh, M. (2012). Ideology, gender roles, and pronominal choice: A sociolinguistic analysis of the use of English third person generic pronouns by native speakers of Arabic.  [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas].
Alqahtani, S. N., & Abdelhalim, S. M. (2020). Gender-based Study of interactive metadiscourse markers in EFL academic writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(10), 1315-1325.
Amerian, M., & Esmaili, F. (2014). Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international ELT textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(2). 3-12.
Amuzie, G. L., & Winke, P. (2009). Changes in language learning beliefs as a result of study abroad. System, 37(3), 366-379.
Anderson, K. T. (2009). Applying positioning theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macro-kinds, and ideologies of knowing. Linguistics and Education, 20(4), 291-310.
Anderson, K. T. (2017). The doctoral gaze: Foreign PhD students’ internal and external academic discourse socialization. Linguistics and Education, 37, 1-10.
Ary, D., Jacobs. L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed). Wadsworth.
Asghar, J. (2014). Language power and ideology in commercial discourse: A prologue to critical discourse analysis for Neophyte analysts. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(4), 225-131.
Aziz, R. A., Jin, C. C., & Nordin, N. M. (2016). The use of interactional metadiscourse in the construction of gender identities among Malaysian ESL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(1), 207-220.
Bacang, B. G., Rillo, R. M., & Alieto, E. O. (2019). The gender construct in the use of rhetorical appeals, hedges and boosters in ESL writing: A discourse analysis. Asian EFL Journal, 25(5), 210-224.
Baleghizadeh, S., & Jamali Motahed, M. (2010). An analysis of the ideological content of internationally-Developed British and American ELT textbooks. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2(2), 1-28.
Barcelos, A. (2000). Understanding teachers’ and students’ language learning beliefs in experience: A Deweyan approach [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Alabama.
Bartlett, L. (2007). Bilingual literacies, social identification, and educational trajectories. Linguistics and Education, 18, 215–231.
Beiki, M., & Gharaguzlu, N. (2017). The analysis of Iranian English school text book: A CDA study based on Norman Fairclough’s 2001 Model. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 55-67.
Berlin, J. (1988). Rhetoric and ideology in writing class. College English, 50 (5), 477-494.
Billig, M. (2008). The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse and Society, 19(6), 783-800.
Bonyadi, A., Samuel, M. (2011). Linguistic nature of presupposition in American and Persian newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics. 3(1), 1-16
De Costa, P. I. (2010). Language ideologies and standard English language policy in Singapore: Responses of a “designer immigrant” student. Language Policy, 9, 217–239.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2023). Self-mention in L2 (Czech) learner academic discourse: Realisations, functions and distribution across master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101272.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In Van Dijk (T.)(Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 258-284). Sage.
Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149-171.
Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24, 1-15.
Handayani, D., Heriyanto, H., & Soemantri, Y. S. (2018). Fairclough’s three dimension framework used on trump’s political speech: A critical discourse analysis (A Case Study of Historic Speech Related to Jerussalem As Israel’s Capital). Aicll: Annual International Conference on Language and Literature.
Hashemi, A., & Daneshfar, S. (2018). A review of the IELTS test: Focus on validity, reliability, and washback. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 39-52.
He, X., Zhou, H. (2015). Contrastive analysis of lexical choice and ideologies in news reporting the same accidents between Chinese and American newspapers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 5(11), 2356-2365.
Heidari, H., Malmir, A., & Zarei, A. A. (2022). The contribution of various dimensions of L2 identity to L1 national identity: A case of the Iranian EFL context. Two Quarterly Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning University of Tabriz, 14(29), 27–43.
Heidari, H., Malmir, A., & Zarei, A. A. (2023). Identity processing styles as predictors of L2 identity dimensions: The interplay of sociocognitive and sociolinguistic inclinations. Teaching English Language, 17(1), 269–296.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Javadi, J., & Mohammadi, M. (2019). The effect of critical discourse-based instruction on Iranian English major students’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 33-52.
Kalaja, P. (1995). Student beliefs (or metacognitive knowledge) about SLA reconsidered. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 191-204.
Kashkuli, F. R., Ghanbari, N., & Abbasi, A. (2016). The effect of Van Dijk Discourse strategies on Iranian EFL learners’ writing proficiency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 810-818.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 71-92.
Kiany, G., Mirhosseini, S., & Navidinia, H. (2011). Foreign language education policies in Iran: Pivotal macro considerations. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 49–70.
Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21-34.
Lin, W. (2008). Identifying ideological perspectives in text and video. Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh.
Msuya, E. A. (2016). Exploring author visibility in academic writing in EFL tanzanian context: A case study of university of Dar es Salaam postgraduate dissertations and theses. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 4(10), 55-61.
 
McGroarty, M. E. (2010). Language and ideologies. In Sociolinguistics and Language Education. Blue Ridge.
Milani, T. M., Johnson, S., (2008). CDA and language ideology: Towards a reflexive approach to discourse data. In I. H., Warnke & J., Spitzmuller (Eds): Methoden der Diskurslinguistik Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugaenge zur transtextuellen Ebene (pp. 361–84). Mouton de Gruyter.
Nejmaoui, N. (2019). Improving EFL learners’ critical thinking skills in argumentative writing. English language teaching, 12(1), 98-109.
Oktaviani, C., & Jauhara, D. (2014). Gender identity of male and female indonesian EFL college students’ academic essays: A critical discourse analysis (Cda). The 61 TEFLIN International Conference (p. 1131). UNS Solo.
Priyanti, N. (2017). Test usefulness of IELTS writing test tasks. Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies. 11(4), 1-9.
Razfar, A. (2005). Language ideologies in practice: Repair and classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education. 16, 404–424.
Roohani, A., & Heidari, N. (2012). Evaluating an instructional textbook: A critical discourse perspective. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 1(1), 123-158.
Sahragard, R., & Davatgarzadeh, G. (2010). The representation of social actors in interchange third edition series: A critical discourse analysis. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(1), 67-89.
Sakui, K., & Gaies, S. J. (1999). Investigating Japanese learners’ beliefs about language learning. System. 27(4), 473-492.
Seargeant, P. (2009). The idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the evolution of a global language. Multilingual Matters, Bristol. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692030
Sharifian, F. (2010). Semantics and pragmatic conceptualizations within an emerging variety: Persian English. In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of world Englishes (pp. 442–460). Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and discourse analysis: A multidisciplinary introduction. Pompeu Fabra University.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115-140.
Veerappan, V., & Sulaiman, T. (2012). A review on IELTS writing test, its test results and inter rater reliability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(1), 138-143.
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about—a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-13). Sage Publications.
Woolard, K. A. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, &P. Kroskrity (Eds.) Language ideologies. Practice and theory (pp. 3-47). Oxford University Press.
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies
Volume 15, Issue 2
September 2023
Pages 133-156

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics