Implicit Bias as Perceived and Developed in Online EFL Teaching/Learning Practices: Learners’ Perceptions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, Razi University of Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Implicitly biased teaching practices or the unconscious discriminatory actions of teachers create the learning-threatening illusion of being biased in the minds of learners. This study identified the main manifestations of implicitly biased teaching practices in online EFL learning, and then, delved deeper into the factors shaping their manifestations. Participants of the study were 45 intermediate-level EFL learners attending an online course in an Iranian public educational institute. Each participant was required to report on the biased teaching practices manifested during the three-month course. In the end, focused interviews were conducted to identify the contributing factors to their perceptions. Results of the study came up through content analysis indicated that intermediate-level learners perceive implicitly biased teaching practices as micro-assault (underrating) or micro-insult (demeaning) behavior each of which could result in a different reaction and participation pattern among themselves. This study concludes that false expectations, negative comparisons, and the online nature of communication are the main factors determining what learners regarded as biased teaching practices. Moreover, this study rejects the efficacy of micro-invalidation in preventing implicit bias in online learning. This study encourages EFL teachers to address their implicit bias through considering the participation and development patterns of their learners.  

Keywords

References

Abrami, P.C., D’Apollonia, S., Rosenfield, S. (2007). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not*.  In R. P. Perry& J.C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp.385-456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_10
Baten, L., Bouckaert, N., & Yingli, K. (2009). A pilot study on the use of communities in a virtual learning environment. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning (pp.137–157). Hershey, PA: Information Science Research. https://doi.org/110.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch008
Bleske-Rechek, A., & Michels, K. (2010). RateMyProfessors.com: Testing assumptions about student use and misuse. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15 (5), 1–12.
Boysen, G. A. (2009). A review of experimental studies of explicit and implicit bias among counselors. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 37.
Brown, A. (2018). From subhuman to human kind: Implicit bias, racial memory, and black males in schools and society. Peabody Journal of Education, 93)1(, 52-65. https://doi.org/110.1080/0161956X.2017.1403176
Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., & Pekrun, R. (2015). Students’ emotions for achievement and technology use in synchronous hybrid graduate; A control-value approach. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
Cashin, W. E. (1995). Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited. ERIC. http://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED402338.
Chugh, D. (2004). Societal and managerial implications of implicit social cognition: Why milliseconds matter. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 203-222.
Conaway, W., & Bethune, S. (2015). Implicit bias and first name stereotypes: What are the implications for online instruction?. Online Learning, 19 (3), 162-178.
Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2006). From automatic anti-gay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 268–280.
Despagne, C. (2013). An investigation into identity, power and autonomous EFL learning among indigenous and minority students in post-secondary education: A Mexican case study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Western Ontario, Canada.
DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
Dowling, C., & Godfrey, J., & Gyles, N. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting       students’ learning outcomes?. Accounting Education, 12, 373-391.
              https://doi.org/110.1080/0963928032000154512.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62. 
Edelson, P. J. (2000).Virtual and face-to-face learning: Meeting points. Paper presented at La FormacionVirtual en el Nuevo Milenio, Madrid, 15-16 June, 2000. http://www.synysb.edu/spd/dean_papers/madrid.pdf.
Felton, J., P. T. Koper, J. Mitchell, & Stinson, M. (2008). Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601122803
Gonzalez, C. M., Lypson, M. L., & Sukhera, J. (2021). Twelve tips for teaching implicit bias recognition and management, Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1879378
Greenwald, A. G., & Krieger, L. H. (2006). Implicit bias: Sci. foundations. California Law Review, 94, 945–967.
Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh H.K., & Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness of Implicit Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), pp. 1369–1392.
Jacoby-Senghor, D. S., S. Sinclair, & J. N. Shelton. (2016). A lesson in bias: The relationship between implicit racial bias and performance in pedagogical contexts. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 63 (70), 50–55.
Lafferty, K. E., & Pang, V.O. (2014). Challenging teacher bias: Implementing a community learning fair. Issues in Teacher Education, 22, 189-203.
Madva, A. (2012). The hidden mechanisms of prejudice: Implicit bias and interpersonal fluency. [Doctoral dissertation]. McKenna, Michael. 2012.
Mc Millan, A., Solanelles, P., & Rogers (2021). Bias in student evaluations: Are my peers out to get me?. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101032.
Nadal, K. L., Issa, M. A., Leon, J., Meterko, V., Wideman, M., & Wong, Y. (2011). Sexual orientation microaggressions:    “Death by a Thousand Cuts” for Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 8(3), 234–259.
Norrick, N. R. (1987). Functions of repetition in conversation. Text-interdisciplinary. Journal for the Study of Discourse, 7(3), 245–264.
Organista, P. B., Chun, K. M., & Mar’ın, G. (2000). Teaching an undergraduate course on ethnic diversity. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 12–17.
Reinholz, D. L., Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Stone-Johnstone, A., Smith, J., Mullins, B., Fortune, N., Keene, K., Shah, N. (2022). When active learning is inequitable: Women’s participation predicts gender inequities in mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(3), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0143
Rezaei, F., & Ghafar Samar, R., & Kiany, G. (2020). Exploring identity representation strategies in English and Persian political discourse. Teaching English Language, 14 (1), 1-29.
Rich, S., & Troudi, S. (2006). Hard times: Arab TESOL students’ experiences of racialization and othering in the United Kingdom. TESOL Quarterly, 40(3), 615–627.
Robinson-Cimpian, J. P., Lubienski, S. T., Ganley, C. M., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of      students’ mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1262–1281.
Rosen, A. S. (2017). Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: A large-scale study of RateMyProfessors.com data, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1276155
Rudman, L. A. (2004). Social justice in our minds, homes, and society: The nature, causes, and consequences of implicit bias. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 129–142.
Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96–120.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seider, S., & Hillman, A. (2011). Challenging privileged college students’ othering language in community service learning. Journal of College and Character, 12. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1810.
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford University Press.
Sengstock, M. C. (2009). Voices of diversity multi-culturalism in America. Springer.
Shelton, J. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(2), 171-186.
Staats, C., Capatosto, K., Tenney, L., & Mamo, S. (2017). State of the science: Implicit bias review 2017. Ohio State University: Kirwan Institute. http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2017-SOTS-final-draft-02.pdf
Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., et al. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286.
Sukhera, J., Milne, A., Teunissen, P.W., Lingard L, & Watling, C. (2018). The actual versus idealized self: exploring responses to feedback about implicit bias in health professionals. Academic Medicine, 93(4), 623–629.
Tamimi Sa’d, S. H., & Eames, Q. E. (2021). A classroom survey of language teachers’ discriminatory practices against students: Causes, consequences and keys. C E P S Journal, 11 (1), 91-113.
Trofimovich, P., & Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, 171-195.
Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
Uhlmann, E. L., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). My culture made me do it: Lay theories of responsibility for automatic prejudice. Social Psychology, 43(2), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000089
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Critical discourse analysis, the handbook of discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, Massachusetts, USA.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch19.
Wulff, D. H., & Nyquist, J. D. (1986). Using qualitative methods to generate data for instructional development. To Improve the Academy, 5(1), 37–46.
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies
Volume 16, Issue 1
March 2024
Pages 75-88

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics