Exploring the Role of Imaginative and Creative AI-oriented Reflections in English Language Teachers’ Professional Development: A Complexity Theory Perspective

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Since reflective practice is regarded as a significant professional learning tool for teachers to change, modify, and reform their educational practices, it is important for teachers to move towards a more creative use of reflection. Thus, imaginative and creative reflective practice can serve as a new approach to enhance teaching efficiency, originality, reflectivity, and practicality. Additionally, teachers can utilize Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to implement reflective practice in creative and imaginative ways to support innovative reflections and address complex teaching challenges. Accordingly, this study employed imaginative and creative reflective practice with a Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) as a novel AI tool. This study explored how imaginative and creative AI-oriented reflective practice could contribute to the professional development of EFL teachers within a complex educational system. To this end, the perspectives of six novice and experienced EFL teachers were examined through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and post-class discussions within a qualitative case study framework. The findings indicated that teachers were able to transform and reform their belief systems by learning new concepts, reflecting on their practices, innovating knowledge and practice, and initiating change through imaginative and creative AI-oriented reflective practice. The study concludes with suggestions on how to engage language teachers in imaginative and creative AI-oriented reflective practices.

Keywords

References

Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.12.008
Arefian, M. H. (2023). Reflections facilitate emotions and emotions filter reflections: Beginning teachers’ perceptions of affective reflective practices. Reflective Practice, 24(1), 59-70.
Ateek, M., & Issa, S. (2024). Examining reflective practice in the Syrian EFL postgraduate context. In A. Cirocki, M. Wyatt & X. A. Gao (Eds.), Developing reflective TESOL practitioners through teacher education: Insights from Asia (pp. 325-346). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2685-1_14
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Bozkurt, A., Junhong, X., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., ... & Romero-Hall, E. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53–130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636568
Bridgeman, A. J., & Shipman, M. A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Education: Promises and        Perils. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 3–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047239520984205
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007. 00148.x
Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Cremin, T., & Chappell, K. (2021). Creative pedagogies: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2014). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Routledge.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
Esfandiari, R., Arefian, M. H., & Lam, R. (2025). Understanding collective and reflective learning-oriented assessment among Iranian EFL pre-service teachers in learner-centered language teacher education. International Journal of Language Testing, 15(1), 91-106.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2003). Learning to teach English language during the first year: personal influences and challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19 (1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00088-4
Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re) visiting Dewey and Schon. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.10
Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. Routledge.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2018). Research on reflective practice in TESOL. Routledge.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2022). Operationalizing reflective practice in second language teacher education (SLTE). Second Language Teacher Education, 1(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1558/slte.21881
Farrell, T. S., & Kennedy, B. (2019). Reflective practice framework for TESOL teachers: One teacher’s reflective journey. Reflective Practice, 20(1), 1–12.
             https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1539657
Ferreira, A., Lima, D. A., Oliveira, W., Bittencourt, I. I., Dermeval, D., Reimers, F., & Isotani, S. (2024). Exploring Brazilian teachers’ perceptions and a priori needs to design smart classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00410-4
Fisher, R. (2004). What is creativity? In R. Fisher & M. Williams (Eds.), Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum (pp. 6-20). Routledge.
Freeman, D. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Oxford University Press.
Greenier, V. T., & Whitehead, G. E. (2016). Towards a model of teacher leadership in ELT: Authentic leadership in classroom practice. RELC Journal, 47(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631203
Gudeta, D. (2022). Professional development through reflective practice: The case of Addis Ababa secondary school EFL in-service teachers. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2030076
Haggis, T. (2008). ‘Knowledge must be contextual’: Some possible implications of complexity and dynamic systems theories for educational research. Educational philosophy and theory, 40(1), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00403.x
Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (Eds.). (2010). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. Springer.
Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: A literature review of the uneasy space of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09912-z
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15873–15892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1
Karadağ, N. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on online assessment: A preliminary review. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 822–837. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1351548
Kim, J. (2024). Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8693–8724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5     
Klein, S. R. (2008). Holistic reflection in teacher education: Issues and strategies. Reflective Practice, 9(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802005384
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. Relc Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12536
Liu, Y., & Chang, P. (2024). Exploring EFL teachers’ emotional experiences and adaptive expertise in the context of AI advancements: A positive psychology perspective. System, 126, article e103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103463
Liu, Z., Vobolevich, A., & Oparin, A. (2023). The influence of AI ChatGPT on improving teachers’ Creative thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(12), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.7
Loughran, J. J. (1996). Developing reflective practice. Flamer Press.
Mason, M. (2008). Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. Wiley Blackwell.
Meihami, H. (2022). An exploratory investigation into EFL teacher educators’ approaches to develop EFL teachers’ ability to teach for creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43,       Articlee101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101006
Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). Virtual teaching abroad during initial teacher education: Pre-service                     teachers’ professional learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2023.2247351
Morron, M. (2023). The impact of AI on learning and creativity: A critical look at the future. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-ai-learning-creativity-critical-lookfuture-miriam-morron
Okoko, J. M., Tunison, S., & Walker, K. D. (Eds.). (2023). Varieties of qualitative research methods. Springer.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Rosen, S. M., Jacobs, C. E., Whitelaw, J., Mallikaarjun, V. R., & Rust, F. (2024). Justice-centered reflective practice in teacher Education: Pedagogy as a process of imaginative and hopeful invention. Education Sciences, 14(4), 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040376
Runco, M., A., & Jaeger, G., J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821552
Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education, 17(3), 8–19.
Strauss, A., & J. Corbin. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed). Sage.
Teng, Y., Zhang, J., & Sun, T. (2023). Data‐driven decision‐making model based on artificial intelligence in higher education system of colleges and universities. Expert Systems, 40(4), e12820. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12820
Yadollahpour, R., & Tajeddin, Z. (2025). Identity marginalization among EFL teachers in Iranian language institutes: a positioning analysis. The Language Learning Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2025.2451945
Zwozdiak-Myers, P. N. (2018). The teacher’s reflective practice handbook: Becoming an extended professional through capturing evidence-informed practice. Routledge.
            https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118733
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies
Volume 17, Issue 1
March 2025
Pages 73-94

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics